The Visitation of the BVM

Here's some info on today's feast.  

The Feast of the Visitation of the Blessed Virgin Mary to Elizabeth is medieval in origin. It started off as a Franciscan devotion and in 1263 Saint Bonaventure recommended it to the Franciscans as a general observance. Him being the Heid Bummer, they agreed! The Franciscan Breviary spread it far and wide. In 1389 the Pope put it in the Roman Calendar, date 2nd July.  It stayed there, the day after the end of the octave of the feast of the Birth of St John the Baptist, who was still in his mother's womb at the time of the Visitation, until 1969 when Pope Paul VI moved it to 31 May, "between the  Annunciation of the Lord (25 March) and the Nativity of St John the Baptist (24 June), so that it would harmonize better with the Gospel story."  Roman Catholics who use a pre-1969 calendar and Anglicans who use the 1662 English BCP celebrate the feast on 2 July - as does the entire Catholic (and Lutheran) Church of Germany, using the post-1969 calendar of Pope Paul VI but with the variations permitted in the German Regional Calendar.

The celebration of this event in the Orthodox Church is more recent (19th century). It was down to Archimandrite Antonin Kapustin, head of the Russian Orthodox Mission in Jerusalem. The Gorneye Convent  in Jerusalem, built on the traditional site of the Meeting of the Virgin Mary) and St. Elizabeth, celebrates this Feast on 30 March. (In the Julian Calendar, 30 March corresponds, until 2099, to the Gregorian Calendar date of 12 April.) . The celebration of the Feast of the Visitation has not yet been accepted by all Orthodox jurisdictions.

Mighty God,
by whose grace Elizabeth rejoiced with Mary
and greeted her as the mother of the Lord:
look with favour on your lowly servants
that, with Mary, we may magnify your holy name
and rejoice to acclaim her Son our Saviour,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever. Amen

St Phillip Neri

 

It was the feast of the delightful and sympathetic St Phillip Neri today.  I think I'd rather put a pikkie of him up today  than anything to do with the temperamental successor of today's other Saint, Augustine of Canterbury - whom the Venomous Bede reminds us lost the Celtic vote by remaining Prelatically seated, rather than rising to humbly greet his separated brethren with whom he had a few disagreements (like the dating of Easter, how to do your tonsure and how to baptise babies etc).  I can fully understand ++ RW getting ratty under pressure and biffing committees into shape, but it sounds rather nasty, especially when the surviving kin of the author of the leaked memo suggest that the Archiepiscopal nastiness hastened the demise of the cancer afflicted Dean of Southwark.  Not a good news day for Lambeth Palace - so we pray that some of Fra Filippo's gentleness and joy will wing it's way to ABC's lodgings.

Back from the "Celtic" (if you only speak English that is) Fringe!

Yes, it has been a while, but it's been busy and I finally got enough kip (doon sooth admittedly) to face trotting out some thoughts!  And it's on Celtic Christianity (WTFeck that is)!

I've been reading around this one a bit recently.  It's rather "in" in God bothering circles these days.  My introduction was via the rigours of a History of Spirituality Course at Furryboots Yooni back in the days of good Bishop Elphinstone where we learnt about a discipline of  having a soul friend, standing up to yir oxters in the Sound of Iona reciting the Psalter when you'd been bad and rolling in nettles when the felt any urges that might worry the sheep!  Nae tree huggin like!  I then spent time at Iona Abbey and discovered the modern form with the shared economic discipline of George MacLeod's Milites Christi.  Which none of much of the current stuff seems to keep in mind. I read some "Liturgies from Lindisfarne" recently which were trite, tree hugging, written in Amerikan and kept attributing The Jesus Prayer to a middle aged Anglican male cleric!

My doubts were amply confirmed by 2 critical volumes.  One by Rosemary Power (Iona Community)"The Celtic Quest: A Contemporary Spirituality" and the other by Donald Meek (former Prof of Heedrum-Hodrum Studies at Embra and Furryboots Unis, son of the Tiree Baptist Manse and native Gaelic speaker - or a REAL Celtic Christian who speaks the lingo!) "The Quest for Celtic Christianity".  Both blast the current Celtic Christianity industry as being dubiously connected to the real thing, mainly produced by middle aged, English male clergy on the working fringe of the institutional Church and all aimed not at the genuinely un-churched but those who feel distanced from the institution and want an alternative structure where the centre of power is redistributed (one imagines to them and their pals in the 1st instance).  I generally agree with the critics.  I see the value of "Celtic Christianity" in as much as it refreshes those for whom Flat Church has gone stale.  But I think it's lack of rootedness in sold Christian tradition means it's a very Post-Modern thing which will fade into insignificance within a few decades - rather like Anglican Papalism has.  Aye right, fine if ye like it - whaur's my copy of "The Cloud of Unknowing" gone, that'll last better!

St George's Day

I am no English nationalist but did observe the Feast of St George today.  Why?

He was a Christian Martyr who lost his life in a time of religious persecution and it strikes me that this is a period in history when we desperately need to remember our own history in order that we do not repeat it foolishly with the boot on the other foot.  It's all too easy to remember our history of being persecuted and use it as an excuse to persecute others.  Rather we should remember - and pray that we have the wisdom never to repeat the errors of  other, less generous, religions.  Killing others for their faith, even if it is a distortion or twisted version, is self-defeating.  It merely gives credibility and status to their untruths.  Osama Bin Laden was, in reality, a terrorist pure and simple.  His religious opinion was incidental to this.  Oh yes, his distorted understanding of Islam inspired his malign actions, but I would hesitate to call him an "Islamic Terrorist" in exactly the same way I would hesitate to describe a member of the Continuing IRA as a "Catholic Terrorist".  To use either title is to perpetuate misunderstanding of faiths that have more good in them than the evil that their most twisted followers represent.

I rather like this bit of an article from Wikipedia: 

"There is a tradition in the Holy Land of Christians and Muslim going to an Eastern Orthodox shrine of St. George at Beith Jala, Jews also attending the site in the belief that the prophet Elijah was buried there. This is testified to by Elizabeth Finn in 1866, where she wrote, "St. George killed the dragon in this country Palestine; and the place is shown close to Beirut. Many churches and convents are named after him. The church at Lydda is dedicated to St. George: so is a convent near Bethlehem, and another small one just opposite the Jaffa gate; and others beside. The Arabs believe that St. George can restore mad people to their senses; and to say a person has been sent to St. George's, is equivalent to saying he has been sent to a madhouse. It is singular that the Moslem Arabs share this veneration for St. George, and send their mad people to be cured by him, as well as the Christians. But they commonly call him El Khudder —The Green—according to their favourite manner of using epithets instead of names. Why he should be called green, however, I cannot tell—unless it is from the colour of his horse. Gray horses are called green in Arabic."A possible explanation for this colour reference is Al Khidir, the erstwhile tutor of Moses, gained his name from having sat in a barren desert, turning it into a lush green paradise."

St George, by your intercession, save us from our madness and teach us to seek the healing of the Most High God, by which ever name we call upon the Holy One.